Communication number 1 in the European Union elections 2004 in Austria

Member in the election authorities because of the candidacy of
"GLASL FRANZ JOSEF" candidate in the European Union elections 2004 in Austria:

Communication
against
electionauthoritymembership robbed by the forbidden parties and  the Federal election authority
and the European Parliament of the EU:

I claim to be victim of a violation by that State Party of all of the rights set forth in the Covenant. 

I am violated esp. in the following rights:
"
Article 25 
 Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions: 
(a) To take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives; 
(b) To vote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors; 
(c) To have access, on general terms of equality, to public service in his country. "

I claim that the Committee and the UNO decides that the legal settings of the ruling parties is illegal eso.
since 1918 and since 1945, and of all other parties concerning the European Union.

Further I claim that 
the 2 candidates published on the ballot paper are declared for inadmissibile

1. Admissiblity:
    The  UNO has the obligation to receive and consider my communications. People involved in the
    complaint concerning the federal president elections 1992 are excluded because of violating 
    these obligations.
2. exhausted all available domestic remedies 
   All domestic remedidies are exhausted.
3. statement of claims:
    I claim to be victim of a violation by that State Party of all of the rights set forth in the Covenant. 
4. examining my communications 
   I claim that the committee is examining my communications.
   As a stated in the past rulecommunication the communication can be decided within a day.
   Examining communications committee members which donot fit these requirements are
   unable in this case anyway and are biased=befangen.
5. Committee views:
   I claim that the Committee
    1. shall forward its views to me. 
     2. sets measures that secure the prohibition of the government and Parliament parties
         and EU-Parliament parties
         -a measure catalogue will presented by myself which is based on the
          practice of the regime parties that is they know what measures they applied until
          now incl. deathly hunting
     3. declares the state actions to be null and void, and are in conflict with the
         Covenant and human rights, and are a breach of the provisions of the
          Covnenat and its protocols
     4. is granting me compensation for the hunting actions and set actions
         which include body harm
     5. condems Austria fully and considers also my note to the criminal court for punishing the state authorities
         and persons acting. I claimed to jail them also.